🔗 Share this article

As the political power of Donald Trump diminishes and his behavior grows increasingly volatile, there has been an escalation in vitriolic attacks aimed at female journalists and racial minorities, including Somali immigrants as a recent focal point. These disparaging remarks gain traction stems from the animosity behind them and his position, not their factual accuracy. In a parallel manner, his administration's offensive against immigrants are haphazard and founded on falsehoods. It is abundantly clear that the goal extends beyond targeting those who have committed crimes. The true target is anyone with brown skin.

This includes Indigenous peoples carrying tribal IDs to naturalized US citizens, from essential workers in construction and healthcare to those who served, college students, people in their own homes, and toddlers: a broad cross-section of the country's population is under siege.

"ICE operations are cruel, unjust and achieve nothing for community security," states a leading political figure from New York. Scenes featuring masked agents shattering windows and dragging parents away from infants, instilling fear and hindering the function of institutions, achieves the opposite effect.

The cycles of orchestrated bigotry—focusing on people from Haiti in the 2024 campaign, Venezuelans this year, and now Somalis—lean heavily on libelous lies and slurs. The reason is simple: the truthful data about these groups of people cannot support the animosity.

The Imaginary Nation of White People Versus Actual History

The strategy of frightening and vilifying claims to seek at recreating a homogeneously white America that is a fantasy. While the US was demographically whiter in the youth of today's white supremacists, it was never exclusively a "white country". At the nation's founding, the thirteen founding colonies included a significant percentage of Black and Indigenous peoples—certain states in the South had Black populations exceeding a third.

When the United States expanded, annexing Texas in 1844 and seizing Mexico's northern territories in 1848, it absorbed a vast community of Hispanic settlers already living across the modern Southwest and California. It is documented that the initial Muslim of African descent in territory that became the U.S. came as part of a Spanish expedition nearly a century before the Mayflower English Puritans landed in Massachusetts in 1620.

Population Truths Versus Coercive Fantasies

The systematic targeting of huge populations of people of color and attempts at large-scale expulsion will not manufacture the all-white nation of extremist imagination. A city like Los Angeles, for instance, is close to 50% Hispanic, and regardless of aggressive enforcement, arrests, and deportations, it remains so. Its name itself is Spanish, an enduring reminder of its original inhabitants.

The entirety of this animus and persecution looks like the fear of racists attempting to believe they can halt the demographic future of a country no longer predominantly white by using pure cruelty.

This is paired with an attack on abortion access that is, at times, explicitly designed to prompt Caucasian women to bear more babies. The rationale cites a fertility rate below replacement level in the US, a phenomenon less impactful than in some other nations because of a hard-working population of immigrant laborers which keeps the economy functioning. Yet, instead of offering the social support that could ease the burdens of parenthood, the strategy has been based on punishment and force.

A prominent journalist observes that the policies on childbirth of certain political figures—along with insults aimed at women without children—amount to pronatalism. This philosophy "usually combines concerns over falling fertility with anti-immigration and anti-women's rights viewpoints."

In a similar vein, analyses show that "efforts to bolster the birth rate do not compensate for broader policies aimed at slashing federal support programs like healthcare for the poor and insurance for kids. The so-called 'pro-family' focus isn't merely about promoting having children. Instead, it is utilized as a tool to push a right-wing political program that endangers the health of women, bodily autonomy, and economic participation."

Contradictory Strategies and Public Rejection

The combination of anti-immigrant and pronatalist policies represent an attempt to artificially redirect the nation's demographic trajectory. Ultimately, both amount to senseless intimidation by proponents of hate who unintentionally demonstrate that their assertions of being better must be rooted in race and gender; without these constructs, their arguments collapse into incoherent nonsense.

A lot of the reasoning offered by the Trump team does not match up with tangible facts and real-world results. For example, maritime attacks in the Caribbean Sea often target tiny boats not confirmed to be carrying narcotics and not able of making it to the United States. Similarly, Venezuela's role in fentanyl trafficking is negligible, and its role in cocaine trafficking is much smaller than that of neighboring countries on the continent.

The government's position extends to climate issues, with a dismissal of "the science of climate change" and "Net Zero goals." An emotional commitment to coal and oil, especially coal mining, leading to policies that compel localities to invest in obsolete and toxic power sources while sabotaging affordable, clean alternatives. Concurrently, health officials have promoted anti-scientific dietary schemes while eroding general public health safeguards.

The foundational assumption of the attacks on immigrants is that non-white individuals not born in the US are threatening outsiders. Yet, from coast to coast—from Los Angeles to Charlotte, from Chicago to Portland—the government's own forces, immigration enforcement personnel, whom local communities perceive as the dangerous and hostile interlopers.

There is no clearer sign of the widespread rejection of these tactics than the countless individuals mobilizing, demonstrating, risking safety and arrest to protect their communities. Municipality after municipality has stood up in protection of its people. No amount of derogatory language or intimidation can change that reality.